Skip to content
https://thestar.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
48
GRADE
F
FIX
4
REVIEW
1
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 1 REVIEW 4 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.91g CO2 per view
FIX
1.91g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.91g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 6.8 MB, producing an estimated 1.91g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.35g, network 0.33g, end-user device 1.23g.
Got: 1.91g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 229.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 229.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 28703 smartphones.

1.91g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 13% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 6.8 MB

Your site
1.91g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.35g
Network
0.33g
End-user device
1.23g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 19.1 kg · Annual: 229.6 kg · ≈ 28703 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Snowplow Analytics✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
87th percentile
FIX
87th percentile
Warning::
1.91g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 13% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 87th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.91g

87th percentile

Cleaner than 13% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 219% more
vs Target 283% more
D
Transfer Efficiency
Action
54% efficient
FIX
54% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 54%
An estimated 3160 KB (46%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 3160 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.87g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
54% efficient

Total waste: 3160 KB (46% of page weight)

Unused JS 3160 KB

0.87g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 6919 KB
Theoretical minimum 3758 KB
Potential savings 3160 KB (0.87g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
PASS
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 270 KB (vs 6919 KB first visit). 386 of 411 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.84g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.07g CO2 (first visit: 1.91g)
First visit
6919 KB
Repeat visit
270 KB

96% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.84g CO2 per returning visitor

386 resources served from cache · 25 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback