Skip to content
https://wired.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
54
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
6.31g CO2 per view
FIX
6.31g CO2 per view
Critical::
6.31g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 22.3 MB, producing an estimated 6.31g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 1.17g, network 1.09g, end-user device 4.05g.
Got: 6.31g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 757.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 757.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 94692 smartphones.

6.31g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 22.3 MB

Your site
6.31g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
1.17g
Network
1.09g
End-user device
4.05g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 63.1 kg · Annual: 757.5 kg · ≈ 94692 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Snowplow Analytics✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
6.31g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

6.31g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 952% more
vs Target 1163% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 442 KB (vs 22826 KB first visit). 145 of 147 resources are served from browser cache, saving 6.19g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.12g CO2 (first visit: 6.31g)
First visit
22826 KB
Repeat visit
442 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 6.19g CO2 per returning visitor

145 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 1367 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 1367 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 1367 KB

0.38g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 22826 KB
Theoretical minimum 21458 KB
Potential savings 1367 KB (0.38g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback