Skip to content

Category: Marketing automation

Wunderkind

Based on 6 real audits

32
Avg. Performance
85
Avg. Accessibility
80
Avg. Best Practices
91
Avg. SEO
67
Avg. Security
72
Avg. Composite
32 /100
Avg. Performance
212 ms
Avg. TTFB
72 /100
Avg. Composite
6
Sites Audited

How Wunderkind sites compare

Wunderkind sites tend to score below average on performance (32/100), compared to the global average of 66/100.

Recent Audits

See all 6 websites using Wunderkind →
SitePerformanceGradeAudited
essence.com17C2026-04-22
rawstory.com49C2026-04-22
wtop.com29C2026-04-22
yourdictionary.com20C2026-04-22
nypost.com51C2026-04-16
myoddballs.com26C2026-04-08

Commonly Used With

Sites that use Wunderkind also commonly use:

Google Search Console Analytics 6Google Tag Manager Tag managers 6core-js JavaScript libraries 6Google Analytics Analytics 6Open Graph Miscellaneous 5Prebid Advertising 5Priority Hints Performance 4Google Font API Font scripts 4Google Publisher Tag Advertising 4Facebook Pixel Analytics 4

Compare with...

Wunderkind vs Google Search ConsoleWunderkind vs Google Tag ManagerWunderkind vs core-jsWunderkind vs Google AnalyticsWunderkind vs Open GraphWunderkind vs PrebidWunderkind vs Priority HintsWunderkind vs Google Font APIWunderkind vs Google Publisher TagWunderkind vs Facebook Pixel

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for Wunderkind sites?
Based on 6 real audits, Wunderkind sites score an average of 32/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does Wunderkind compare on web security?
Wunderkind sites score an average security grade of 67/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for Wunderkind websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for Wunderkind sites is 212ms based on 6 audits.
How can I improve my Wunderkind site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your Wunderkind site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your Wunderkind site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback