Skip to content

XRegExp

Based on 2 real audits

41
Avg. Performance
89
Avg. Accessibility
100
Avg. Best Practices
96
Avg. SEO
71
Avg. Security
75
Avg. Composite
41 /100
Avg. Performance
100 ms
Avg. TTFB
75 /100
Avg. Composite
2
Sites Audited

How XRegExp sites compare

XRegExp sites tend to score below average on performance (41/100), compared to the global average of 47/100.

Recent Audits

SitePerformanceGradeAudited
www.docker.com42C2026-04-07
www.youtube.com40C2026-04-07

Commonly Used With

Sites that use XRegExp also commonly use:

YouTube Video players 2Open Graph Miscellaneous 2HSTS Security 2WordPress CMS 1Varnish Caching 1SyntaxHighlighter Miscellaneous 1RSS Miscellaneous 1Redux JavaScript frameworks 1reCAPTCHA Security 1RankMath SEO WordPress plugins 1

Compare with...

XRegExp vs YouTubeXRegExp vs Open GraphXRegExp vs HSTSXRegExp vs WordPressXRegExp vs VarnishXRegExp vs SyntaxHighlighterXRegExp vs RSSXRegExp vs ReduxXRegExp vs reCAPTCHAXRegExp vs RankMath SEO

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for XRegExp sites?
Based on 2 real audits, XRegExp sites score an average of 41/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does XRegExp compare on web security?
XRegExp sites score an average security grade of 71/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for XRegExp websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for XRegExp sites is 100ms based on 2 audits.
How can I improve my XRegExp site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your XRegExp site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your XRegExp site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback